|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by afterlab
I can't stand seeing the font, Times New Roman on sites. It simply shows that the webmaster, or HTML creator was too lazy to add a little tag. Plus, if they wanted Times New Roman, I don't know one guy that actually likes that font.
|
Y'know, as much as I like and respect you for this place, afterlab, I find this a tad bit hypocritical. You yourself were too lazy to add <smallfont> / <normalfont> tags around signatures here, meaning all text in siggies here is Times New Roman by default!
all the Times New Roman here is really ugly, imo, and it's also what I hate most, hence my vote went to TNR.
Oh, and I don't ever get pop-ups so I couldn't vote on that (gotta love Mozilla, it removes pop-ups for you so you'll never be bothed by those, not even if you'd go to warez sites or anything)
Oh and to the person that said TNR should never have existed: it's a good font for on paper, to a certain degree (my personal pref is still arial/verdana, but TNR makes for easier reading to some ppl, it's serif) but definitely horrible for websites... |
|
|
|
|
you use frames 
( 
Linear Mode
